ttgart,
>HRB 17122
>
>
>
>
>From: "Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)" <s.j.thomp...@bham.ac.uk>
>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
>Date: 10/11/2017 01:22 PM
>Subject:Re: [gpfsug-discuss] C
ate: 10/11/2017 01:22 PM
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Checking a file-system for errors
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Yes I get we should only be doing this if we think we have a problem.
And the answer is, right now, we're not entirely clear.
We have a
Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Checking a file-system for errors
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
OK thanks,
So if I run mmfsck in online mode and it says:
"File system is clean.
Exit status 0:10:0."
Then I can assume there is no benefit to running in offline mode?
But
Yes I get we should only be doing this if we think we have a problem.
And the answer is, right now, we're not entirely clear.
We have a couple of issues our users are reporting to us, and its not
clear to us if they are related, an FS problem or ACLs getting in the way.
We do have users who are
omp...@bham.ac.uk>
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Date: 10/11/2017 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Checking a file-system for errors
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
OK thanks,
So if I run mmfsck in onli
OK thanks,
So if I run mmfsck in online mode and it says:
"File system is clean.
Exit status 0:10:0."
Then I can assume there is no benefit to running in offline mode?
But it would also be prudent to run "mmrestripefs -c" to be sure my
filesystem is happy?
Thanks
Simon
On 11/10/2017, 11:19,
Hm , mmfsck will return not very reliable results in online mode,
especially it will report many issues which are just due to the transient
states in a files system in operation.
It should however not find less issues than in off-line mode.
mmrestripefs -c does not do any logical checks, it
