Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-11 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 10/05/2020 14:28, Jaime Pinto wrote: The rationale for my suggestion doesn't have much to do with the central DNS server, but everything to do with the DNS client side of the service. If you have a very busy cluster at times, and a number of nodes really busy with 1000+ IOPs for instance, so

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-10 Thread Felipe Knop
Aaron,   Not sure if this matches your symptoms precisely, but this appears to be the same problem as the one fixed in   https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/IV93896   (fixed in 5.0.2.0 / 4.2.3.13)   This particular problem/fix above did not cause nodes to be expelled. It "just" affected how the

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-10 Thread Josh Catana
: Jaime Pinto > To: gpfsug main discussion list , > TURNER Aaron > Date: 05/10/2020 09:28 AM > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution > issue > Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org > -- > > > &g

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-10 Thread RICHARD RUPP
, TURNER Aaron Date: 05/10/2020 09:28 AM Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org The rationale for my suggestion doesn't have much to do with the central DNS server

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-10 Thread Jaime Pinto
of Jonathan Buzzard *Sent:* 09 May 2020 23:22 *To:* gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org *Subject:* Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue On 09/05/2020 12:06, Jaime Pinto wrote: DNS shouldn't be relied upon on a GPFS cluster for internal communication/management or data. The 1980's

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-10 Thread TURNER Aaron
@spectrumscale.org Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue On 09/05/2020 12:06, Jaime Pinto wrote: > DNS shouldn't be relied upon on a GPFS cluster for internal > communication/management or data. > The 1980's have called and want their lack of IP resolution protocols ba

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-09 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 09/05/2020 12:06, Jaime Pinto wrote: DNS shouldn't be relied upon on a GPFS cluster for internal communication/management or data. The 1980's have called and want their lack of IP resolution protocols back :-) I would kindly disagree. If your DNS is not working then your cluster is

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-09 Thread Jaime Pinto
DNS shouldn't be relied upon on a GPFS cluster for internal communication/management or data. As a starting point, make sure the IP's and names of all managers/quorum nodes and clients have *unique* entries in the hosts files of all other nodes in the clusters, being the same as how they