sfargo.com
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Behalf Of Jonathan Buzzard
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 8:24 AM
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Protect and disk pools
On 04/01/2021 12:21, Simon Thompson wrote:
I think the collocation settings of the target pool for the migration come
into play as well. If you have multiple filespaces associated with a node
and collocation is set to FILESPACE, then you should be able to get one
migration process per filespace rather than one per node/collocation group.
ordi.cau...@es.ibm.com"
Reply to: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org"
Date: Monday, 4 January 2021 at 13:36
To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org"
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Protect and disk pools
Simon,
which kind of storage pool are you using, DISK or FILE ? I understan
Simon,which kind of storage pool are you using, DISK or FILE ? I understand DISK pool from your mail. DISK pool does not behave the same as FILE pool.DISK pool is limited by the number of nodes or MIGProcess setting (the minimum of both) as the document states. Using proxy helps you backup in
