Re: [gpfsug-discuss] RFE upvote request for "Change NSD Name" RFE

2020-12-01 Thread Bryan Banister
Just for clarification, this RFE is for changing the name of the Network Shared Disk device used to store data for file systems, not a NSD I/O server node name, -Bryan From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org On Behalf Of Christopher Black Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:26 PM To:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] memory needed for gpfs clients

2020-12-01 Thread Renata Maria Dart
Thanks very much for your feedback Chris. Renata On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Christopher Black wrote: >We tune vm-related sysctl values on our gpfs clients. >These are values we use for 256GB+ mem hpc nodes: >vm.min_free_kbytes=2097152 >vm.dirty_bytes = 3435973836 >vm.dirty_background_bytes =

[gpfsug-discuss] RFE upvote request for "Change NSD Name" RFE

2020-12-01 Thread Bryan Banister
Hey all... Hope all your clusters are up and performing well... Got a new RFE (I searched and didn't find anything like it) for your consideration. The ability to change the name of an existing NSD: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=147125 We embed information

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] RFE upvote request for "Change NSD Name" RFE

2020-12-01 Thread Christopher Black
+1 from me. Someone did a building block install for us and named a couple io nodes with initial upper case (unlike all other unix hostnames in our env which are all lowercase). For a while it just bothered us, and we complained occasionally to hear that it was not easy to change. Over two

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] memory needed for gpfs clients

2020-12-01 Thread Christopher Black
We tune vm-related sysctl values on our gpfs clients. These are values we use for 256GB+ mem hpc nodes: vm.min_free_kbytes=2097152 vm.dirty_bytes = 3435973836 vm.dirty_background_bytes = 1717986918 The vm.dirty parameters are to prevent NFS from buffering huge amounts of writes and then pushing

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] memory needed for gpfs clients

2020-12-01 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 01/12/2020 19:07, Christopher Black wrote: CAUTION: This email originated outside the University. Check before clicking links or attachments. We tune vm-related sysctl values on our gpfs clients. These are values we use for 256GB+ mem hpc nodes: vm.min_free_kbytes=2097152 vm.dirty_bytes =

[gpfsug-discuss] memory needed for gpfs clients

2020-12-01 Thread Renata Maria Dart
Hi, some of our gpfs clients will get stale file handles for gpfs mounts and it seems to be related to memory depletion. Even after the memory is freed though gpfs will continue be unavailable and df will hang. I have read about setting vm.min_free_kbytes as a possible fix for this, but wasn't

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] internal details on GPFS inode expansion

2020-12-01 Thread Wayne Sawdon
Dave Johnson at d...@brown.edu asks: When GPFS needs to add inodes to the filesystem, it seems to pre-create about 4 million of them. Judging by the logs, it seems it only takes a few (13 maybe) seconds to do this. However we are suspecting that this might only be to request the