Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

The first patch is at least in Samba 4.2 and newer. The patch to the vfs_gpfs module is only in Samba 4.3 and newer. So any of these should fix your problem: - Add the vfs_gpfs patch to the source code of Samba 4.2.9 and recompile the code. - Upgrade to Sernet Samba 4.3.x or newer - Change

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

By the way, we are planning to go to CES / 4.2.x in a matter of weeks, but understanding this problem was quite important for me. Perhaps knowing now that the fix is probably to install a different version of Samba, we’ll probably leave it alone. Thank you everyone for your help, Richard

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

I’m afraid it’s not a typo ☺ [root@server gpfs]# rpm -qa | grep sernet sernet-samba-ctdb-tests-4.2.9-19.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-common-4.2.9-19.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-winbind-4.2.9-19.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-ad-4.2.9-19.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-libs-4.2.9-19.el6.x86_64

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

Hi Richard, Is that a typo in the version? We’re also using Sernet Samba but we’ve got 4.3.9… Kevin On Jul 6, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Sobey, Richard A > wrote: Cheers Christof. We're using Sernet Samba [4.2.9] so limited by what they release.

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

Cheers Christof. We're using Sernet Samba [4.2.9] so limited by what they release. How can I identify which version of Samba is a) affect by the the first link and b) which version has got the patch incorporated? I'm not a developer as you can guess :) -Original Message- From:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

The message in the trace confirms that this is triggered by: https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=acbb4ddb6876c15543c5370e6d27faacebc8a231 I suspect that the Samba version used misses the patch

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

Thanks Daniel – sorry to be dense, but does this indicate working as intended, or a bug? I assume the former. So, the question still remains how has this suddenly broken, when: [root@server ict]# mmgetacl -k nfs4 .snapshots/ .snapshots/: Operation not permitted …appears to be the correct

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

Sure. It might be easier if I just post the entire smb.conf: [global] netbios name = store workgroup = IC security = ads realm = IC.AC.UK kerberos method = secrets and keytab vfs objects = shadow_copy2 syncops gpfs fileid ea support = yes store dos attributes = yes map

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Snapshots / Windows previous versions

Can you cut/paste your full VFS options for gpfs and shadow copy from smb.conf? On 06/07/2016 10:37, Sobey, Richard A wrote: Quick followup on this. Doing some more samba debugging (i.e. increasing log levels!) and come up with the following: [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3]