Re: [gpfsug-discuss] replicating ACLs across GPFS's?

Just a cautionary note, it doesn't work with symlinks as it fails to get the acl and so doesn't copy the symlink. So you may want to run a traditional rsync after just to get all your symlinks on place. (having been using this over the Christmas period to merge some filesets with acls...)

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] replicating ACLs across GPFS's?

Great guys!!! Just what I was looking for. Everyone is always so helpful on this forum. Thanks a lot. Jaime Quoting "Laurence Horrocks-Barlow" : Are you talking about the GPFSUG github? https://github.com/gpfsug/gpfsug-tools The patched rsync there I believe was done

[gpfsug-discuss] TCT and CentOS

  TCT development and test haven't looked at CentOS at all so that's why we don't support it.  That said, people ignoring our support matrix and trying CentOS have come to us with CentOS problems that I have just completely ignored (there's enough on my plate to keep me busy developing and

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] TCT and CentOS

On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:18:08 +, "Rob Basham" said: > By way of introduction, I am TCT architect across all of IBM's storage > products, including Spectrum Scale. There have been queries as to whether or > not CentOS is supported with TCT Server on Spectrum Scale. It is not > currently >

[gpfsug-discuss] TCT and CentOS

By way of introduction, I am TCT architect across all of IBM's storage products, including Spectrum Scale.  There have been queries as to whether or not CentOS is supported with TCT Server on Spectrum Scale.  It is not currently supported and should not be used as a TCT Server.  Please contact me

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] replicating ACLs across GPFS's?

Are you talking about the GPFSUG github? https://github.com/gpfsug/gpfsug-tools The patched rsync there I believe was done by Orlando. -- Lauz On 05/01/2017 22:01, Buterbaugh, Kevin L wrote: Hi Jaime, IBM developed a patch for rsync that can replicate ACL’s … we’ve used it and it works

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] replicating ACLs across GPFS's?

Hi Jaime, IBM developed a patch for rsync that can replicate ACL’s … we’ve used it and it works great … can’t remember where we downloaded it from, though. Maybe someone else on the list who *isn’t* having a senior moment can point you to it… Kevin > On Jan 5, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Jaime Pinto

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] nsd not adding with one quorum node down?

Looking at this further, the output says the “The following disks of home will be formatted on node cl003:“ however that node is the node in ‘arbitrating’ state, so I don’t see how that would work, -B From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] nsd not adding with one quorum node down?

Removing the quorum designation is an option. However I believe the file system manager must be assigned to the file system in order for the mmadddisk to work. If the file system manager is not assigned (mmlsmgr to check) or continuously is reassigned to nodes but that fails (check

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] nsd not adding with one quorum node down?

There may be an issue with one of the other NSDs in the file system according to the “mmadddisk: File system home has some disks that are in a non-ready state.“ message in our output. Best to check the status of the NSDs in the file system using the `mmlsdisk home` and if any disks are not

[gpfsug-discuss] nsd not adding with one quorum node down?

I have one quorum node down and attempting to add a nsd to a fs: [root@cl005 ~]# mmadddisk home -F add_1_flh_home -v no |& tee /root/adddisk_flh_home.out Verifying file system configuration information ... The following disks of home will be formatted on node cl003: r10f1e5: size 1879610 MB