yes... to add some more details even though it might be very theoretical,
that only some nodes from the foreign cluster 'll suffer from connection
issues, the rule to react up on expel request isA) if the requested node is really unreachable
(or in trouble) ... the node will loose the disk
Achim,
Thankyou for your clear reply. Yes indeed we are using AFM at the moment.
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Achim Rehor
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 11:21 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
John, yes, they definitely can!Nodes in a remote cluster are tob viewed
just as local nodes in terms of taking part in the mechanisms of access
to data.Token management will be done just as
with local nodes. So if one node in cluster A recognizes
a communication issue with a node in cluster B, it
Hi
You can do remote mount between GPFS clusters.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_5.0.0/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v5r00.doc/bl1adv_admmcch.htm
Where is you daemon communication network ? IP ir IP Over IB ?
Regards
Yaron Daniel
94 Em Ha'Moshavot Rd
Server, Storage
The FAQ has a note stating:
1. AFM, Asynch Disaster Recovery with AFM, Integrated Protocols, and
Installation Toolkit are not supported on RHEL 7.4.
Could someone please clarify this sentence ? It can't be right that none of
these features are supported with RHEL 7.4, or .. ?
-jf
