Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmaddcallback documentation issue

2018-08-06 Thread Eric Sperley
See if this helps https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_5.0.1/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v5r01.doc/bl1adm_mmaddcallback.htm Best Regards, Eric

[gpfsug-discuss] mmaddcallback documentation issue

2018-08-06 Thread Buterbaugh, Kevin L
Hi All, So I’m _still_ reading about and testing various policies for file placement and migration on our test cluster (which is now running GPFS 5). On page 392 of the GPFS 5.0.0 Administration Guide it says: To add a callback, run this command. The following command is on one line:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Sub-block size not quite as expected on GPFS 5 filesystem?

2018-08-06 Thread Hoang Nguyen
That comment in the Administration guide is a legacy comment when Metadata sub-block size was restricted to 1/32 of the Metadata block size. In the past, creating large Metadata block sizes also meant large sub-blocks and hence large directory blocks which wasted a lot of space. From: on

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Sub-block size not quite as expected on GPFS 5 filesystem?

2018-08-06 Thread Buterbaugh, Kevin L
Hi All, So I was just reading the GPFS 5.0.0 Administration Guide (yes, I actually do look at the documentation even if it seems sometimes that I don’t!) for some other information and happened to come across this at the bottom of page 358: The --metadata-block-size flag on the mmcrfs command