none Additional mount options
-T /gpfs/home Default mount point
--mount-priority 0Mount priority
[root@nsd75-01 ~]#
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Walter Sklenka
Technical Consultant
EDV-Design Informationstechnologie
and how to
design the filesystems for such large clusters ?
Thank you very much in advance !
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Walter Sklenka
Technical Consultant
EDV-Design Informationstechnologie GmbH
Giefinggasse 6/1/2, A-1210 Wien
Tel: +43 1 29 22 165-31
Fax: +43 1 29 22 165-90
E-Mail: skle...@edv-design.at
, or is the reason more a poor metadata perf for the long running
command?
But if you say so we will change it to N=5000
Best regards
Walter
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Walter Sklenka
Technical Consultant
EDV-Design Informationstechnologie GmbH
Giefinggasse 6/1/2, A-1210 Wien
Tel: +43 1 29 22 165
l overhead than
using routers
Or am I totally wrong?
Thank you very much and keep healthy!
Best regards
Walter
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Walter Sklenka
Technical Consultant
EDV-Design Informationstechnologie GmbH
Giefinggasse 6/1/2, A-1210 Wien
Tel: +43 1 29 22 165-31
Fax: +43 1 29 22 165-90
E-
; Walter
Sklenka
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] OPA HFI and Mellanox HCA on same NSD Server with
only ib rdma enabled
In our HPC infrastructure we have 6 NSD server, running CentOS 7.4, each of
them with with 1 Intel QDR HCA to a QDR Cluster (now 100 nodes SandyBridge cpu
it was 300 nodes CentOS 6.5
2021 20:42
To: Walter Sklenka
Cc: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] OPA HFI and Mellanox HCA on same NSD Server with
only ib rdma enabled
On 30/01/21 21:01, Walter Sklenka wrote:
> Hi Giovanni!
> Thats great! Many thanks for your fast and detailed answer
> So
20:42
To: Walter Sklenka
Cc: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] OPA HFI and Mellanox HCA on same NSD Server with
only ib rdma enabled
On 30/01/21 21:01, Walter Sklenka wrote:
> Hi Giovanni!
> Thats great! Many thanks for your fast and detailed answer
Hi Givanni !
I understand and am convinced that the is an excellent solution !!
Thank you very much!
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Bracco
Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021 09:59
To: Walter Sklenka
Cc: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] OPA HFI and Mellanox
Hi Jan!
That great to hear
So we will try this
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Walter Sklenka
Technical Consultant
EDV-Design Informationstechnologie GmbH
Giefinggasse 6/1/2, A-1210 Wien
Tel: +43 1 29 22 165-31
Fax: +43 1 29 22 165-90
E-Mail: skle...@edv-design.at<mailto:skle...@edv-design.at>
In
very much for any input !
Best regards walter
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Walter Sklenka
Technical Consultant
EDV-Design Informationstechnologie GmbH
Giefinggasse 6/1/2, A-1210 Wien
Tel: +43 1 29 22 165-31
Fax: +43 1 29 22 165-90
E-Mail: skle...@edv-design.at<mailto:skle...@edv-design.at>
In
the Ethernet as well , (as long all those nodes are in the same
cluster)
laff
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: "Walter Sklenka"
mailto:walter.skle...@edv-design.at>>
Gesendet von:
gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscal
gpfsug-discuss digest..."Today's Topics: 1. alternate path
between ESS Servers forDatamigration (Walter Sklenka)
Dear spectrum scale users!
May I ask you a design question?
We have an IB environment which is very mixed at the moment ( connecX3 …
connect-X6 with FDR , even FDR10
Hello Douglas!
May I ask a basic question regarding GPUdirect Storage or all local attached
storage like NVME disks. Do you think it outerperforms "classical" shared
storagesystems which are attached via FC connected to NSD servers HDR attached?
With FC you have also bounce copies and more
13 matches
Mail list logo
