Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue

ate: 01/09/2017 09:30 PM Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org Hi, We have already come across the issues you have seen below, and worked around them. If you run the pre-fetch with just the --meta-data-only, then

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue

: +972-3-916-5672 Mobile: +972-52-8395593 e-mail: y...@il.ibm.com IBM Israel From: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfr...@tanso.net> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Date: 01/09/2017 05:30 PM Subject: Re: [gpfsug-

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue

fsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue Hi All, We have just completed the first data move from our old cluster to the new one using AFM Local Update as per the guide, however we have noticed that all date stamps on the directories have the date they were created on(e.g.

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue

rumscale.org Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue Hi All, We have just completed the first data move from our old cluster to the new one using AFM Local Update as per the guide, however we have noticed that all date stamps on the directories have the date they were created on(e.g.

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue

Untested, and I have no idea if it will work on the number of files and directories you have, but maybe you can fix it by rsyncing just the directories? rsync -av --dry-run --include='*/' --exclude='*' source/ destination/ -jf man. 9. jan. 2017 kl. 16.09 skrev : >

[gpfsug-discuss] AFM Migration Issue

Hi All, We have just completed the first data move from our old cluster to the new one using AFM Local Update as per the guide, however we have noticed that all date stamps on the directories have the date they were created on(e.g. 9th Jan 2017) , not the date from the old system (e.g. 14th