sug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Note: External Email
Hi Bryan,
NO - it has the fix for the mmrestripefs data loss bug, but you need the efix
on top of 4.2.3-4 for the mmadddisk / mmdeldisk issue.
Let m
t;
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Sobey, Richard A
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:13 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
<gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4
list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Note: External Email
Aha, I’ve just realised what you actually said, having seen Simon’s response
and twigged. The defect 1020461 matches what IBM has told me in my PMR
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Sobey, Richard A
Sent: 30 August 2017 14:56
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
No worries, I’ve got it sorted and hopefully about to grab the 4
list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Hi Richard,
Well, I’m not sure, which is why it’s taken me a while to respond. In the
README that comes with the efix it lists:
Defect APARDescription
1032655 None AFM: Fix Truncate filtering
ugh, Kevin L
<kevin.buterba...@vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 4:53:51 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Hi Richard,
Since I upgraded my cluster to GPFS 4.2.3.4 over the weekend IBM created an
efix for it for the NSD deletion / creat
rumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org>
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Stock
Sent: 27 August 2017 01:35
To: gpfsug main discussion list
<gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>>
Subject: Re:
-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Stock
Sent: 27 August 2017 01:35
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
The only change missing is the change delivered in 4.2.3 PTF3 efix3 which was
pr
le.org>
Date: 08/27/2017 09:32 AM
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Fred / All,
Thanks - important followup question … does 4.2.3.4 contain the fix for
the mmrestripefs data loss bug that was announced last w
bm.com>
From:"Buterbaugh, Kevin L"
<kevin.buterba...@vanderbilt.edu<mailto:kevin.buterba...@vanderbilt.edu>>
To:gpfsug main discussion list
<gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>>
Date: 08/26/2017 03:40 PM
Subject
: "Buterbaugh, Kevin L" <kevin.buterba...@vanderbilt.edu>
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Date: 08/26/2017 03:40 PM
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Hi All,
Doe
Hi All,
Does anybody know if GPFS 4.2.3.4, which came out today, contains all the
patches that are in GPFS 4.2.3.3 efix3?
If anybody does, and can respond, I’d greatly appreciate it. Our cluster is in
a very, very bad state right now and we may need to just take it down and bring
it back up.
12 matches
Mail list logo
