Johnson
Sent: 20 August 2018 17:55
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P
I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated
there using mmapplypolicy.
The new half is only 50% full, and the old half is 94% full.
Disks
Yes the arrays are in different buildings. We want to spread the activity over
more servers if possible but recognize the extra load that rebalancing would
entail. The system is busy all the time.
I have considered using QOS when we run policy migrations but haven’t yet
because I don’t know
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:02:05 -0400, "Frederick Stock" said:
> Note you have two additional NSDs in the 33 failure group than you do in
> the 23 failure group. You may want to change one of those NSDs in failure
> group 33 to be in failure group 23 so you have equal storage space in both
>
.ibm.com
>
>
>
> From:David Johnson
> To: gpfsug main discussion list
> Date: 08/20/2018 12:55 PM
> Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P
> Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
> -
iscussion list
> Date:08/20/2018 12:55 PM
> Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P
> Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
>
>
>
> I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated
> ther
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Date: 08/20/2018 12:55 PM
Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool
migrated there using mmapplypolicy
I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated
there using mmapplypolicy.
The new half is only 50% full, and the old half is 94% full.
Disks in storage pool: cit_10tb (Maximum disk size allowed is 516 TB)
d05_george_23 50.49T 23 No Yes
