Hi JAB,
Sound interesting, however, I'm actually a newcomer to Scale, I wish I
could share the joy of mixing that. I guess maybe it is something similar
to LSF RVU/UVUs? Thanks for sharing your experience anyway.
Hi Carl,
I just want to let you know that I have got your explanation, and I
of Carl Zetie -
ca...@us.ibm.com
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:16:38 PM
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale licensing - important correction
Rob Horton wrote:
>I'm not sure what the issue is between DDN and IBM (although I've heard
>various
Dean Flanders:
> Thanks for the clarification. I have always heard the term "existing
> customers" so originally I thought we were fine,
> but this is the first time I have seen the term "existing systems". However,
> it seems what I said before is mostly correct,
> eventually all customers will
Rob Horton wrote:
>I'm not sure what the issue is between DDN and IBM (although I've heard
>various rumors)
>but I really wish they would sort something out.
Yes, it’s a pain. IBM and DDN are trying very hard to work something out, but
it’s hard to get all the ‘I’s dotted and ‘T’s crossed with
>Now the question, ESS is license per Drive or by capacity?
I apologize for the confusion. Within IBM Storage when we say “capacity”
licensing we use that as an umbrella term for both Per TB/PB *or* Per Drive
(HDD or SSD). This is contrasted with “processor” metrics including Socket and
the
On 17/04/2020 11:31, T.A. Yeep wrote:
Hi Carl,
I'm confused here, in the previous email it was said *And for ESS, it is
licensed Per Drive with different prices for HDDs and SSDs.*
But then you mentioned in below email that:
But new customers and new OEM systems are *all licensed by
We're in the same boat. I'm not sure what the issue is between DDN and
IBM (although I've heard various rumors) but I really wish they would
sort something out.
Rob
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 07:35 +, Steve Hindmarsh wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the ICR. Do not click
>
ftware on their DDN
system)
-michael
Michael Sedlmayer
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Behalf Of Flanders, Dean
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:40 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale licensing - important corr
system)
-michael
Michael Sedlmayer
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Behalf Of Flanders, Dean
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:40 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale licensing - important correction
Hello
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Behalf Of Flanders, Dean
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:40 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale licensing - important correction
Hello Carl,
Thanks for the clarification. I have
M
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale licensing - important correction
> From my understanding existing customers from DDN, Lenovo, etc. that
>have v4 with socket based licenses are not entitled v5 licenses socket
>licenses. Is that a correct understanding
> From my understanding existing customers from DDN, Lenovo, etc. that have v4
> with socket based licenses
>are not entitled v5 licenses socket licenses. Is that a correct understanding?
It is not, and I apologize in advance for the length of this explanation. I
want to be precise and as
, 2020 2:44 PM
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale licensing - important correction
Folks, I need to correct a common misunderstanding that is perpetuated here:
> As IBM has completely switched to capacity based licensing in order to
> use SS v5
F
Folks, I need to correct a common misunderstanding that is perpetuated here:
> As IBM has completely switched to capacity based licensing in order to use SS
> v5
For new customers, Scale is priced Per TB (we also have Per PB licenses now for
convenience). This transition was completed in
14 matches
Mail list logo
