Truong, thanks again for the response. I shall implement what is suggested in
the FAQ.
As we are in polite company I shall maintain a smiley face when mentioning
systemd
From: John Hearns
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 4:49 PM
To: 'gpfsug main discussion list'
Truong, thankyou for responding.
The discussion which Renar referred to discussed system version 208, and
suggested upgrading this.
The system I am working on at the moment has systemd version 219, and there is
only a slight minor number upgrade available.
I should say that the temporary fix
This sounds like a known problem that was fixed. If you don't have the
fix, have you checkout the around in the FAQ 2.4?
Tru.
From: gpfsug-discuss-requ...@spectrumscale.org
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Date: 08/02/2017 06:51 AM
Subject:gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 67,
Thankyou Renar. In fact the tests I am running are in fact tests of a version
upgrade before we do this on our production cluster..
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Grunenberg, Renar
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017
Hallo John,
you are on a backlevel Spectrum Scale Release and a backlevel Systemd package.
Please see here:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=00104bb5-acf5-4036-93ba-29ea7b1d43b7=25
Renar Grunenberg
Abteilung Informatik – Betrieb
HUK-COBURG
Bahnhofsplatz
96444
I am setting up a filesystem for some tests, so this is not mission critical.
This is on an OS with systemd
When I create a new filesystem, named gpfstest, then mmmount it the filesystem
is logged as being mounted then immediately dismounted.
Having fought with this for several hours I now find
