Re: [gpfsug-discuss] number of SMBD processes

2017-10-04 Thread Ouwehand, JJ
cuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] Namens Christof Schmitt Verzonden: maandag 2 oktober 2017 19:13 Aan: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org CC: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Onderwerp: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] number of SMBD processes Hello, the short answer is that the "deadtime" parameter is n

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] number of SMBD processes

2017-10-02 Thread Christof Schmitt
Hello,   the short answer is that the "deadtime" parameter is not a supported parameter in Spectrum Scale.   The longer answer is that setting "deadtime" likely does not solve any issue. "deadtime" was introduced in Samba mainly for older protocol versions. While it is implemented independent of

[gpfsug-discuss] number of SMBD processes

2017-10-02 Thread Ouwehand, JJ
Hello, Since we use new "IBM Spectrum Scale SMB CES" nodes, we see that that the number of SMBD processes has increased significantly from ~ 4,000 to ~ 7,500. We also see that the SMBD processes are not closed. This is likely because the Samba global-parameter "deadtime" is missing.