Original Message
Subject: Re: [gPXE] Fails to get an address under gpxe, gets one under pxe
From:tr...@mail.cs.drexel.edu
Date:Wed, April 14, 2010 9:14 am
To: Thomas Miletich thomas.milet...@gmail.com
Hello gpxe community,
is there anyone out there having experience replacing the bios pxe stack by
gpxe?
The hardware we have is:
1. Manufacturer: TYAN Computer Corporation
Product Name: S2925
2. Manufacturer: Supermicro
Product Name: H8SMI
if so can you tell me how to do it? What are the
Jonathan Andrews wrote:
Has the definition of POST changed?
Sorry for the delayed response. You might enjoy:
http://www.phoenix.com/docs/specsbbs101.pdf
- Shao Miller
___
gPXE mailing list
gPXE@etherboot.org
Op 20100414 om 10:29 schreef Christopher Armenio:
Andrew,
Thanks for the quick reply. I tried the gPXE 0.9.7 image as you suggested,
but it didn't detected the NIC at all. Here are the results of some playing
around:
gPXE 1.0.0:
e1000 - not detected
eepro - not detected
eepro100
Geert,
Here is the output of 'lspci -n -s 02:07'
02:07.0 0200: 8086:1209 (rev 10)
Thanks!
-Chris
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nlwrote:
Op 20100414 om 10:29 schreef Christopher Armenio:
Andrew,
Thanks for the quick reply. I tried the gPXE 0.9.7 image
Christopher, the gPXE source code suggests that 8086:1209 is indeed
handled by EEPRO100, as you originally claimed. It still might be good
to try gPXE 1.0.0+ anyway. - Shao
___
gPXE mailing list
gPXE@etherboot.org
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:29 PM, tr...@cs.drexel.edu wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gPXE] Fails to get an address under gpxe, gets one under pxe
From: tr...@mail.cs.drexel.edu
Date: Wed, April 14, 2010 9:14 am
To:
