On 05/26/2010 04:28 PM, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:38 PM, das_deniz wrote:
... snip ...
>>
>> to sum up our new points of confusion:
>>
>> 1) if we're chaining, as described here,
>> http://etherboot.org/wiki/pxechaining,
>> and not burning gPXE ROMs for NICs, are we alwa
On 05/26/2010 04:04 PM, Miller, Shao wrote:
> Good day Das,
>
> Are you using Nortel 470-48T layer 2 switches?
No sir, this is an HP virtual switch blade center.
> Would you care to share the VENdor and DEVice IDs for the HP ProLiant
> BL460c G6 Server's NIC or do you already know there is no gP
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:38 PM, das_deniz wrote:
> patient pxe people,
>
> after months of usage -- pretty much as described here
> http://etherboot.org/wiki/httpboot -- we were recently pushed out of
> our comfort zone (read as "gpxe times out at dhcp net0 on new hardware
> HP ProLiant BL460c
Good day Das,
Are you using Nortel 470-48T layer 2 switches?
Would you care to share the VENdor and DEVice IDs for the HP ProLiant
BL460c G6 Server's NIC or do you already know there is no gPXE driver?
undionly.kkpxe will only have the UNDI driver, meaning it's relying on
the original NIC's PXE.
