[jira] Commented: (GRFT-101) Allow developer to supply "newInstace" method in subclass of ObjectConverterImpl

2006-09-21 Thread Dan Connelly (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-101?page=comments#action_12436669 ] Dan Connelly commented on GRFT-101: --- The setCollection method in a previous comment is not necessary. Its the same as the setNestedProperty method. > Allow deve

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-101) Allow developer to supply "newInstace" method in subclass of ObjectConverterImpl

2006-09-21 Thread Dan Connelly (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-101?page=comments#action_12436668 ] Dan Connelly commented on GRFT-101: --- A proper patch just for this issue would take more] time than I have because I have other changes in this code, particularly a

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-101) Allow developer to supply "newInstace" method in subclass of ObjectConverterImpl

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-101?page=comments#action_12436645 ] Christophe Lombart commented on GRFT-101: - Dan, Can you provide a patch for this issue ? > Allow developer to supply "newInstace" method in subclass of >

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-101) Allow developer to supply "newInstace" method in subclass of ObjectConverterImpl

2006-09-14 Thread Dan Connelly (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-101?page=comments#action_12434654 ] Dan Connelly commented on GRFT-101: --- Also, since collection may be an immutable (where collection cannot be set in an object, but items in the existing collection