yes, sorry for the lack of detail. Indeed, the issue was my method of timing
start=time.time()
v.all_neighbors()
print(time.time()-start)
there is overhead with the print statement, I suspect it is in converting
the decimal.
thanks for your help!
--
Sent from:
http://main-discussion-list-for
On 11.02.2018 18:41, Howmahgee wrote:
> From trying it on various machines, it seems that it takes around 0.01s for
> v.all_neighbors() where v is an arbitrary vertex.
In [2]: %timeit v.all_neighbors()
263 ns ± 1.4 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
So, not quite.
As u
