Yann Chemin wrote:
Just wanted to keep exact track of the processing leading to a new layer.
1 - would it be feasible to store the whole processing line with
parameters (i.e. r.something -a input=file_in output-file_out etc...)
as metadata in the output file of a module ?
2008/6/9 Glynn Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yann Chemin wrote:
Just wanted to keep exact track of the processing leading to a new layer.
1 - would it be feasible to store the whole processing line with
parameters (i.e. r.something -a input=file_in output-file_out etc...)
as metadata in the
Yann Chemin wrote:
well, since G_recreate_command passed it into the metadata,
I guess already that is good.
I was thinking more of a kind of command log,
but with time-based
separation of commands used in txt files.
Whether they are stored inside a mapset would just be
convenient.
see
#184: v.in.garmin - detect gpstrans or gardump instead of user flag
--+-
Reporter: kyngchaos| Owner: hamish
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Milestone:
#120: New v.example proposal
--+-
Reporter: marisn | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: 6.4.0
#22: Grass r.out.mat 64bit Matlab reading problem
--+-
Reporter: alexice | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: minor| Milestone: 6.3.0
#22: Grass r.out.mat 64bit Matlab reading problem
--+-
Reporter: alexice | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: minor| Milestone: 6.3.0
#105: r.in.xyz: zscale parameter addition patch
--+-
Reporter: neteler | Owner: hamish
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
Component:
#105: r.in.xyz: zscale parameter addition patch
--+-
Reporter: neteler | Owner: hamish
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
Component:
#105: r.in.xyz: zscale parameter addition patch
--+-
Reporter: neteler | Owner: hamish
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
Component:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Glynn Clements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hamish wrote:
Any final comments before the entire source tree is
reformatted?
Any thoughts on keeping the inter-branch svn merge effort low?
Don't merge?
Eventually, 7.x and 6.x are going to diverge by more than
#172: r.recode truncates last character in rules file.
---+
Reporter: bgullatt | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major |
#91: ps.map doesn't remove .tmp files when it is done
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone:
13 matches
Mail list logo