MN:
> > Since there are no comments there does not seem to be a bug
> > in GRASS 6.x.
> > So: if it ain't broken, don't fix it.
PK:
> That's true; I agree. It's definitely not a bug; just a change for
> potential future compatibility with invalid raster files so
> we don't need it now.
just to
Martin wrote:
> > I also added to the list nviz_cmd module. I am not
> > sure about its name. Any ideas?
> >
> > nviz.cmd
>
> I remember votes for d.3d and votes again this proposal.
> Any consensus before rc1?
my 0c vote is for d.3d [for the d.* purists: could the outputted png be
used in the GU
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Michael Barton wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:21 AM,
wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:21:17 +0100
From: "Martin Landa"
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] 6.4rc1
To: Hamish
Cc: grass-dev
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
2008/12/1 Martin Land
On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:21 AM, > wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:21:17 +0100
From: "Martin Landa"
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] 6.4rc1
To: Hamish
Cc: grass-dev
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
2008/12/1 Martin Landa :
2008/12/1 Hamish :
so what remains to
#402: v.in.ogr buffer overflow
--+-
Reporter: epatton | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major| Mil
#402: v.in.ogr buffer overflow
--+-
Reporter: epatton | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major| Mil
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Paul Kelly
wrote:
#392: backport G_is_c_null_value() to devbr6
Comment (by hamish):
For rc2, to completely replace null_val.c or not? I am still a bit unsure-
is there actually a bug in the current devbr6 version or
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2008/12/1 Martin Landa :
2008/12/1 Hamish :
so what remains todo befor 6.4rc1? IMO lib API and module list should be
frozen at that point, which means creating releasebranch_6_4. No need to
I also added to the list nviz_cmd module. I am not sure
#82: new module: v.to.3d
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: martinl
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
Component: Vector
Hi,
2008/12/1 Martin Landa :
> 2008/12/1 Hamish :
>> so what remains todo befor 6.4rc1? IMO lib API and module list should be
>> frozen at that point, which means creating releasebranch_6_4. No need to
>
> I also added to the list nviz_cmd module. I am not sure about its
> name. Any ideas?
>
> nvi
#344: TODO: move high priority incubated modules into main
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone
#404: wxNviz does not start
--+-
Reporter: jachym | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
C
#73: r.out.gdal tiff output does not work
--+-
Reporter: helena | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 6.
#404: wxNviz does not start
-+--
Reporter: jachym | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
Compo
14 matches
Mail list logo
