On 11/04/14 13:05, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi Jurgen,
2014-04-11 12:42 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
although the architecture may differ, we may get some inspiration for python
windows handling from other GIS projects like QGIS?
in QGIS python is also in heavy use, e.g. QGIS processing
On 13/04/14 17:03, Moritz Lennert wrote:
[...]
I don't think this a very helpful attitude. This whole debate is not
about one bad guy keeping the rest of the good guys from moving forward.
First of all, Glynn is not alone in his position.
I agree. I tend to take a conservative view,
2014-04-13 17:03 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be:
On 11/04/14 13:05, Martin Landa wrote:
I don't think this a very helpful attitude. This whole debate is not about
one bad guy keeping the rest of the good guys from moving forward. First of
all, Glynn is not alone in his
Hi Moritz,
On Sun, 13. Apr 2014 at 17:03:17 +0200, Moritz Lennert wrote:
On 11/04/14 13:05, Martin Landa wrote:
2014-04-11 12:42 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
That way you could use the stock sources and wouldn't have to use patches
when packaging (which would have been my pragmatic
nobody is saying anything about a bad gay, it's your feeling not mine
well, I meant a guy of course :-) I hope that there is at least a
reason to smile ;-) Martin
--
Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
Hi Moritz,
1) Should GRASS be the same (i.e. feature parity) on all platforms ?
for sure, why not?
2) How much less effort can we ask of Windows users than we ask of users
of other platforms ?
GRASS was developed in a time when Windows didn't even exist. And it was
developed in a very
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Benjamin Ducke bendu...@fastmail.fmwrote:
But please: Let's keep (minor) version-specific Python support
and all of its associated problems out of the core release.
I really believe that this whole conundrum was caused by not
taking that step earlier.
The
