On 14/04/14 17:34, Moritz Lennert wrote:
On 08/04/14 14:03, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi all,
potentially I have a student who could spend some time on this topic.
Currently we have for G6 an addons module (bash script) [1] which
depends on nn-c library [2]. This library is distributed under MIT
lice
On 08/04/14 14:03, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi all,
potentially I have a student who could spend some time on this topic.
Currently we have for G6 an addons module (bash script) [1] which
depends on nn-c library [2]. This library is distributed under MIT
licence, but partly it's depending on tringle
Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> not including python, have a look here:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/mswindows/GRASS-Packager.bat.tmpl#L113
>
> @echo Copy Python content to PACKAGE_DIR\Python27
>
> and then maybe you have to adapt the starting script and all other ?!
I
Moritz Lennert wrote:
> the argument that GRASS4Win should be a different beast
> than GRASS4NIX in that it should become a monolithic integrated
> application, which, IMHO, fundamentally alters the very nature of what
> GRASS is.
There's no fundamental reason why we can't have "Lite" and "Fu
>So, there is a vision by some that for the reasons of apparent
>"incompatibility" between the way GRASS works and Windows,
>GRASS has to
>be different on windows. I.e. that GRASS has to become a monolithic
>application on Windows.
I wouldn't call it incompatibility and I think GRASS hasn't to b
2014-04-14 9:53 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
> There is quite a large margin between creating a monolithic application with
> everything bundled and leaving the user alone...
>
> To answer Martin's call for concrete action: how difficult would it be for
> you, Helmut, to create a GRASS installer with
On 14/04/14 00:21, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
Hi Moritz,
1) Should GRASS be the same (i.e. feature parity) on all platforms ?
for sure, why not?
Not to single out MarkusM, but just since he formulated it so clearly:
>On 09/04/14 08:16, Markus Metz wrote:
>> On Windows, GRASS should behave li
On 13/04/14 20:33, Martin Landa wrote:
2014-04-13 17:03 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
On 11/04/14 13:05, Martin Landa wrote:
I don't think this a very helpful attitude. This whole debate is not about
one bad guy keeping the rest of the good guys from moving forward. First of
all, Glynn is not alone
On 13/04/14 20:32, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
And IMHO the broader topics would have been better addressed in (a) separate
thread(s) and not side-track this one. Your original problem got out of focus,
but still isn't solved, is it?
IMHO, the broader topics are the core of this thread !
;-)
Mor
