#2669: v.net.iso: different results depending on direction
--+-
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: normal
Hello programmers.
Consider a Python class with methods that derive a somewhat complex mapcalc
expression which contains the following pixel modifiers:
['A[-1, -1]', 'A[-1, 0]', 'A[-1, 1]', 'A[0, -1]', 'A[0, 0]', 'A[0, 1]',
'A[1, -1]', 'A[1, 0]', 'A[1, 1]']
These modifiers built-up a moving
#2349: CELL raster format: make ZLIB level 3 standard compression instead of RLE
--+---
Reporter: neteler | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 7.1.0
#2669: v.net.iso: different results depending on direction
--+--
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.1
Component: Vector
On 04-05-15 20:36, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Alba German albager...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am running a loop with several r.mapcalc. I am using GRASS 7.1. The
function stops with an error:
ERROR: Error reading null row 8 for MASK
I've noticed that Paulo van
Martin:
2015-05-05 13:42 GMT+02:00 Nikos Alexandris n...@nikosalexandris.net:
it's not possible, to enable installing this extension via
g.extension, you need to move this extension to `grass7/imagery`.
Nikos:
Thanks Martin. Is grass7/imagery the safest place to move into? Just
#2670: v.voronoi skeleton: nonsense result with many adjacent polygons
-+-
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.1
Component: Default |
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.net wrote:
* Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com [2015-05-05 08:51:06 -0400]:
So, you folks keep a complete copy of it locally?
Yes sure.
Isn't it big?
No, 154MB.
Markus
Nikos
#2503: wxdigit: wrong undo redo
--+-
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: wxGUI|Version: svn-trunk
Resolution:
On 06/05/15 14:42, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
* Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be [2015-05-06 12:59:16 +0200]:
On 06/05/15 12:25, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
Hello programmers.
Consider a Python class with methods that derive a somewhat complex mapcalc
expression which contains the
#2666: GRASS 7 r.horizon outputting single file for mode 2
---+--
Reporter: bdmorri2 | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: 7.0.1
Component: Raster|Version: 7.0.0
#2503: wxdigit: wrong undo redo
--+-
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: wxGUI|Version: svn-trunk
Resolution:
* Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com [2015-05-05 08:51:06 -0400]:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Nikos Alexandris n...@nikosalexandris.net
wrote:
* Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com [2015-05-05 13:41:32 +0200]:
2015-05-05 13:42 GMT+02:00 Nikos Alexandris n...@nikosalexandris.net:
Hi all!
Here is the output of the file I use for masking. It was a vector
transformed to raster, and I use each pixel with different value as a mask.
I need the value per pixel to perform the r.mapcalc.
GRASS 7.1.svn (latlong):~ r.info puntosmonitoreo
* Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org [2015-05-06 14:41:21 +0200]:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.net wrote:
* Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com [2015-05-05 08:51:06 -0400]:
So, you folks keep a complete copy of it locally?
Yes sure.
Isn't it big?
Hi,
I am using a fresh checkout of Grass 7.0.1 r65194, and it compiled with no
errors
(error.log is empty).
Machine details:
uname -a Linux W5-DAR-EPATTON 3.13.0-24-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2
23:30:00 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.net wrote:
* Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com [2015-05-05 08:51:06 -0400]:
So, you folks keep a complete copy of it locally?
Yes sure.
Isn't
Nikos Alexandris wrote:
Consider a Python class with methods that derive a somewhat complex
mapcalc
expression which contains the following pixel modifiers:
['A[-1, -1]', 'A[-1, 0]', 'A[-1, 1]', 'A[0, -1]', 'A[0, 0]', 'A[0, 1]',
'A[1, -1]', 'A[1, 0]', 'A[1, 1]']
These modifiers
18 matches
Mail list logo