On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:15 AM Sunveer Singh
wrote:
>
> I am Sunveer Singh, I graduated from high school in 2021 and will start my
> undergraduate studies in Fall 2021 and have been accepted into a university
> so it makes me eligible to participate in GSoC this year.
>
Congratulations and
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:09 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
>
> I suggest removing the github test for Centos 7 and using Centos 8
> instead, if possible.
>
I have no problem with that. The tests are at this point whatever is
practical to test. For Ubuntu, we so far followed whatever are the VMs on
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:09 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:29 PM Markus Metz
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:35 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
> >
> > > Similarly to the GDAL and PROJ issue where I don't think it is necessary
> > > to have GRASS C89/C++98 compliant when you
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:29 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:35 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
> > Similarly to the GDAL and PROJ issue where I don't think it is
necessary to have GRASS C89/C++98 compliant when you need C++11 for GDAL
anyway.
>
> The C code of GRASS master is
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:14 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I prepared a change to g.parser and related code which changes the option
definitions in scripts (aka script header) from:
>
> #%option
> #% key
> #%end
>
> to:
>
> # %option
> # % key
> # %end
>
> The reason is PEP8 compliance
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:35 AM Vaclav Petras wrote:
> Similarly to the GDAL and PROJ issue where I don't think it is necessary
to have GRASS C89/C++98 compliant when you need C++11 for GDAL anyway.
The C code of GRASS master is currently compatible with a lot of GDAL and
PROJ versions, also
Dear all,
We just received our very first sponsorship contribution of 2021 (thank
you !) and we want to take this occasion to thank all those who sponsored us
last year and remind you that the GRASS
GIS project needs financial support in order to:
- organize very valuable face-to-face
