Dear PSC,
2015-01-08 4:02 GMT+01:00 Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu:
I made small language edits which did not change the meaning of the document
and I agree with the document.
thanks a lot! BTW, is there any open issue? If not, we could probably
move on towards voting?
Martin
--
Martin
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear PSC,
2015-01-08 4:02 GMT+01:00 Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu:
I made small language edits which did not change the meaning of the document
and I agree with the document.
thanks a lot! BTW, is there any
Dear all, I went trough the document and it make perfectly sense to me.
Just a minor comment is that we shall probably clearly specify who is
responsible for the mentioned actions: call for soft, hard freeze etc.
Basically who is responsible to recall all to the respect of the mentioned
On Jan 7, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Massimiliano Cannata
massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch wrote:
Dear all, I went trough the document and it make perfectly sense to me.
I agree. I updated its date now and expanded RC in the beginning.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?
For this RFC? Yes. But I think we are pretty close now.
I did cosmetics
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Massimiliano Cannata
massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch wrote:
Dear all, I went trough the document and it make perfectly sense to me.
I agree. I updated its date now and expanded RC in the beginning.
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure
Last
Hi,
I read the document and support it,
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
Last doubts:
* Step1: The Project manager (or if exists the Release manager)
then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support
for this proposal.
Hi all,
2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.
I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?
On 06/01/15 11:25, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi all,
2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.
I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
deadline for discussion and then to
IMHO lack of answer in a transparent procedure with reasonable
response windows just means carry on, everyone agrees. Having a
fixed last date for comments might force someone to say something (or
used as an argument for STFU later).
Just my 0.02,
Māris.
2014-12-29 9:50 GMT+02:00 Markus
I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.
A statement : if there are no further comments or feedback for the 7 days, RC1
will be released on XXX date
may help in case somebody has some issues and was just delaying posting them.
Also for the PSC, it appears that the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu wrote:
I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.
A statement : if there are no further comments or feedback for the 7 days,
RC1 will be released on XXX date
may help in case somebody has some
I agree. Even if we cannot get time to look at it, we can at least check in and
say that.
Michael
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution Social Change
Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 24/11/14 14:38, Martin Landa wrote:
Dear all,
as we are closer and closer to GRASS 7 release I would like to open
discussion related to Release procedure - RFC4 [1]. Ideally (I would
say) it would make
On 24/11/14 14:38, Martin Landa wrote:
Dear all,
as we are closer and closer to GRASS 7 release I would like to open
discussion related to Release procedure - RFC4 [1]. Ideally (I would
say) it would make sense to find a way how accept such procedure
before we start with GRASS RCs...
Thanks
15 matches
Mail list logo
