On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Vaclav Petras wrote:
> la.h removed from gmath.h in r66485. I tested that with and without LAPACK
> configured. Work as expected. Perhaps the #error can be removed from the
> modules if it makes sense to have it in la.h (as I did that).
I
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Glynn Clements
wrote:
>
> > Having la.h as a separate header would conveniently hide the compilation
> > issue on that Debian server.
> >
> > So, should I remove la.h from gmath.h?
>
> I think so.
la.h removed from gmath.h in r66485. I
Vaclav Petras wrote:
> I like the idea of a separate header but I would leave the implementation
> in lib/gmath. Or is this going too much against how other libraries are
> done? I'm also not sure how the prefixes should work, but these seems OK
> since there are functions with same prefix (G_)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Glynn Clements
wrote:
>
> Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
> > I was not able to determine from svn why gmath.h contains la.h.
>
> AFAICT, it's because the functions are in lib/gmath. Of course, that
> then brings up the question why they're there,
Vaclav Petras wrote:
> I was not able to determine from svn why gmath.h contains la.h.
AFAICT, it's because the functions are in lib/gmath. Of course, that
then brings up the question why they're there, rather than in a
separate library ...
Incidentally, the whole of lib/gmath/la.c is
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> On 05/10/15 16:49, Vaclav Petras wrote:
...
>> Sorry for being -pedantic but I don't think we should leave the code
>> messy.
>
> +1
Then it needs to be removed everywhere here:
cd grass-addons
find . -type f
On 05/10/15 16:49, Vaclav Petras wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Martin Landa > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2015-10-05 9:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa >:
> > compilation was simply
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Moritz Lennert
> wrote:
> > On 05/10/15 16:49, Vaclav Petras wrote:
> ...
> >> Sorry for being -pedantic but I don't think we should leave the code
> >>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Glynn Clements
wrote:
>
> Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> > >> Sorry for being -pedantic but I don't think we should leave the code
> > >> messy.
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > Then it needs to be removed everywhere here:
> >
> > cd grass-addons
> >
Markus Neteler wrote:
> >> Sorry for being -pedantic but I don't think we should leave the code
> >> messy.
> >
> > +1
>
> Then it needs to be removed everywhere here:
>
> cd grass-addons
> find . -type f | grep -v pristin | xargs grep 'la.h>'
> ./grass6/imagery/i.spec.unmix/global.h:#include
Hi,
2015-10-05 3:04 GMT+02:00 Vaclav Petras :
> this shouldn't be necessary and same for r66404, gmath.h contains already
> grass/la.h. Any possible compilation issue is an issue with configuration
> (local or in GRASS) or with the gmath.h file. What was the reason for the
>
Hi,
2015-10-05 9:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa :
> compilation was simply failing on build server (Debian stable):
>
>> In file included from main.c:47:0:
>> global.h:28:29: error: unknown type name ‘vec_struct’
>> global.h:28:43: error: unknown type name ‘vec_struct’
>>
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2015-10-05 9:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa :
> > compilation was simply failing on build server (Debian stable):
It is working on Ubuntu and probably Fedora as well. Perhaps it is a local
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 9:08 AM, wrote:
>
> Author: neteler
> Date: 2015-10-04 06:08:45 -0700 (Sun, 04 Oct 2015)
> New Revision: 66413
>
> Modified:
>grass-addons/grass7/vector/v.kriging/local_proto.h
> Log:
> v.kriging: add missing la.h header
>
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
14 matches
Mail list logo