Maybe enough (best) to handle it in the manual?
Meaning, add that information to the notes?
Users can avoid that lines/boundaries are broken by running v.dissolve in
advance if needed?
Cheers
Stefan
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Martin Landa wrote
> Hi,
>
> 2017-03-27 21:39 GMT+02:00 Helmut Kudrnovsky <
> hellik@
> >:
>> G7A:v.clip - very easy to use and expected GIS functionality without
>> hassle
>> of complicated commmands :-)
>>
>> tested v.clip quite a lot in the last weeks; very nice module with
>> expected
>> GIS
On 27/03/17 21:53, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
Markus Neteler wrote
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Martin Landa <
...
Please (all) check
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Grass7Planning#a7.2.1tobebackported
Addon candidate to be moved t
Hi,
2017-03-27 21:39 GMT+02:00 Helmut Kudrnovsky :
> G7A:v.clip - very easy to use and expected GIS functionality without hassle
> of complicated commmands :-)
>
> tested v.clip quite a lot in the last weeks; very nice module with expected
> GIS functionality
please note that v.clip has one known
Markus Neteler wrote
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <
> hellik@
> > wrote:
>> Markus Neteler wrote
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Martin Landa <
> ...
>>> Please (all) check
>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Grass7Planning#a7.2.1tobebackported
>>
>> Addon candidate
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Martin Landa <
...
>> Please (all) check
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Grass7Planning#a7.2.1tobebackported
>
> Addon candidate to be moved to trunk
https://trac.osgeo.org/gr
Markus Neteler wrote
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Martin Landa <
> landa.martin@
> > wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> based on roadmap published in ML [1] we are close to RC1. There are no
>> blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
>> preparing RC1. Any objections?
>>
>> Ma
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Martin Landa
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > based on roadmap published in ML [1] we are close to RC1. There are no
> > blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
> > preparing RC1. Any ob
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> based on roadmap published in ML [1] we are close to RC1. There are no
> blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
> preparing RC1. Any objections?
>
> Ma
>
> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2
Hi all,
based on roadmap published in ML [1] we are close to RC1. There are no
blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
preparing RC1. Any objections?
Ma
[1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2017-February/084328.html
[2]
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?stat
10 matches
Mail list logo