On 15 June 2014 01:12, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Moritz Lennert
> wrote:
>> I very rapidly drafted a RFC for that:
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure
>
> To me the proposed procedure looks very good.
me too, It is a good compromise betwe
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> I very rapidly drafted a RFC for that:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure
To me the proposed procedure looks very good.
We may test it asap with GRASS 7.0.0beta3 if you agree.
Markus
__
Hi,
2014-06-11 11:30 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
> Recent discussion have convinced me that we might need a more clearly
> defined release procedure for the GRASS project in order to make release
> more fluid and less conflictual.
thanks for your effort.
> I very rapidly drafted a RFC for that:
>
Hello,
Recent discussion have convinced me that we might need a more clearly
defined release procedure for the GRASS project in order to make release
more fluid and less conflictual.
I very rapidly drafted a RFC for that:
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure
It's a very e
