Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:14:18 +0100
> From: Jachym Cepicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS-user] v.coordinate.sh - improve this
> script?
> To: Luca Casagrande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Barton
> <[EMAIL P
Hi,
Luca Casagrande píše v Pá 25. 01. 2008 v 13:34 +0100:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I have started studying python more deeper for using it in pyWPS
cool, we need more people :-) We have to move to WPS 1.0.0, so I'm
looking forward to see your code ;-)
> and
> for creating new Qgis modules (with QT).
Eh, maybe I was misundertsood. I didn't mean to consider the hypothesis to
move to QT. I was asking, as Luca, about the reasons of the choice. I'm not
a programmer too, so it's better to me (as many of us) to use an easier
development framework like wxPython then QT.
I just noted that it could have
Another reason beyond the one that I mentioned to Luca is that we went
through many potential interface development languages 2 years ago,
decided on wxPython, and the wxPython is now almost complete. It would
be an enormous time sink to do this all over again.
Michael
_
We are using wxPython instead of wxWindows. There was a long
discussion about this a couple years back. As I understand it, both
wxWindows and QT are natively built in C++. This, and related factors
of how one actually operationalizes an interface, makes their
programming considerably more
Thanks, the reasons of the choice are clear. I obviously were not asking to
switch to pyQT! I know it would a completely new work.
I was just considering how to take advantage from the fact that Python is
common to Grass and QGis...
Giovanni
2008/1/25, Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
2008/1/25, G. Allegri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would have asked the same question as Luca. Wouldn't it be more profitable
> using QT, as it is already the way Python script are written in QGis? I know
yes, that's true, it would be profitable at the end.
> the two projects are independent, bu
Hi Luca,
2008/1/25, Luca Casagrande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> I have started studying python more deeper for using it in pyWPS and
> for creating new Qgis modules (with QT).
> Just for knowing, is there any reason for using wxWindow instead of Qt
> for the new GUI?
> is it a matter of licens
I would have asked the same question as Luca. Wouldn't it be more profitable
using QT, as it is already the way Python script are written in QGis? I know
the two projects are independent, but having a common GUI language could
improve the development of scripts in both the environments and the
port
Hi,
Nikos Alexandris píše v Čt 24. 01. 2008 v 16:34 +0100:
> Michael,
>
> thank you for these important details for new GRASS users (like me). On
> the web I have found some good resrources for bash scripting. Is there
> something for Python (for beginners) and maybe GRASS-oriented as well?
>
>
On Jan 24, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
Michael,
thank you for these important details for new GRASS users (like
me). On
the web I have found some good resrources for bash scripting. Is there
something for Python (for beginners) and maybe GRASS-oriented as well?
Thank you,
Ni
On Jan 24, 2008, at 6:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:12:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "Gabriele N." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [GRASS-user] v.coordinate.sh - improve this script?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
12 matches
Mail list logo
