Thanks! Will try it out!
Doug
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Vaclav Petras
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Vaclav Petras
> wrote:
>
>> With the resolution option one case change the resolution of the output
>> while using computational region to set extent and resolut
Hi all,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote:
> With the resolution option one case change the resolution of the output
> while using computational region to set extent and resolution of the base
> raster. However, after discussion with Doug, I see that it makes more sense
> to m
Hi,
in r66151, I've fixed/enabled the resolution option in combination with the
base raster. When the option resolution is set, the module is little bit
slower as it uses Segment library. Determining the optimal size of segments
according to percentage option is a todo.
With the resolution option
This feature will be greatly appreciated by anyone working with lidar and
vegetation.
Doug
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in r66094, I've added base raster map to r.in.lidar. When provided,
> r.in.lidar with subtract its values from the points' z values. In this
Hi,
in r66094, I've added base raster map to r.in.lidar. When provided,
r.in.lidar with subtract its values from the points' z values. In this way,
one can get height about ground.
Needs testing before general anouncement, so feel free to do so.
Adding a simple suggestion how to do a benchmark o
