Re: [GRASS-dev] r.watershed lsfac

2008-11-28 Thread Helena Mitasova
Markus, I checked and it seems to be still multiplied by 100 (I cc to Chuck as he is much better qualified to tell): in sg_factor.c we have 69 L = 100 * pow((slope_length / 72.6), s_l_exp); but L is defined as double on line 55 so the multiplication is perhaps not necessary? Same for

[GRASS-dev] r.watershed lsfac

2008-11-18 Thread Helena Mitasova
the man page for r.watershed says that the lsfac is multiplied by 100, but the result is DCELL so I am wondering whether the multiplication is still true. (and if yes whether it should be changed) And how is this for the new r.watershed2? thanks, Helena On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Glynn