Hi devs,
In r63363 I submitted an update of space time doc for several modules
using the new temporal dataset.
I'm going to make the new dataset available in the next days to test
and comment it.
Stay tuned ;-)
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org
On 26 November 2014 at 20:22, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree.
Maybe we should add daily temperature far a year, (they are usefull
for t.rast.accumulate) do you have these data?
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2014 at 20:22, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree.
Maybe we should add daily temperature far a year, (they are usefull
for t.rast.accumulate) do you have these data?
No, there
On 8 October 2014 at 03:21, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
as you know we need to decide which data are we going to use for t.vect.*
examples. One possibility is to use oceanfront shorelines of North Carolina,
we can get this data easily from here:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8 October 2014 at 03:21, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
as you know we need to decide which data are we going to use for t.vect.*
examples. One possibility is to use oceanfront
On Nov 26, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Anna Petrášová wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2014 at 03:21, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
as you know we need to decide which data are we going to use for t.vect.*
examples. One
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
...
yes, but there are no NC towns as points in the standard dataset.
There is a (small) geonames layer in the standard NC dataset which we
could add (updated).
But polygons would be better for zonal statistics.
...
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
yes, but there are no NC towns as points in the standard dataset.
There is a (small) geonames layer in the standard NC dataset which we
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com
Do we have any temporal data for 3d raster? I don't think we necessarily
On 26 November 2014 at 20:22, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, but there are no NC towns as points in the standard dataset. You could
use precip_30ynormals@PERMANENT which are the meteorology stations, which
probably doesn't make much sense since but maybe it's still good for
On 26 November 2014 at 21:02, Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Anna is right - in fact these are the stations which were used to create the
rasterized climate time series so there is no need to create
virtual weather stations - we already have the real ones. We can get more
complete
On 26 November 2014 at 21:10, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
But polygons would be better for zonal statistics.
As Anna wrote we need points, but we should have both. Maybe
census_wake2000 or nc_state?
Markus
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org
On 26 November 2014 at 21:31, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, we have a lot of options... We have to decide for one.
yes, the proposal are:
- shoreline ocean
- contour from precip and/or temp
- contour from LIDAR
so?
do we have any? We would have to have a timeseries of
Hi,
as you know we need to decide which data are we going to use for t.vect.*
examples. One possibility is to use oceanfront shorelines of North
Carolina, we can get this data easily from here:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cm/download-spatial-data-maps-oceanfront
It includes these years,
Anna,
to put these data into context, the dataset should include also at least one
ortho (probably for 2009) and perhaps
also a lidar-based DEM for 2009.
I think that the detail will work better - maybe you can show it on orthophoto
or a DEM to make it easier to understand what
the lines mean.
15 matches
Mail list logo
