Re: [GRASS-dev] scientific notation in r.mapcalc ?

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Markus Neteler wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2017 5:41 PM, "Moritz Lennert" wrote: > > ... > > Markus, what was your recent issue ? Maybe that will ring a bell for me... > > I think we were on a system with Italian locale.

Re: [GRASS-dev] scientific notation in r.mapcalc ?

On Jun 16, 2017 5:41 PM, "Moritz Lennert" wrote: ... > Markus, what was your recent issue ? Maybe that will ring a bell for me... I think we were on a system with Italian locale. I will ask if it was happening when using the GUI (likely yes). Markus

Re: [GRASS-dev] scientific notation in r.mapcalc ?

Hi Glynn ! On 16/06/17 02:35, Glynn Clements wrote: Markus Neteler wrote: I just stumbled upon this while running a large model, and noticed that I couldn't easily find an answer: IIUC r.mapcalc does not support scientific notation of floating point numbers (i.e. 2.54e-05 instead of

Re: [GRASS-dev] scientific notation in r.mapcalc ?

Markus Neteler wrote: > > I just stumbled upon this while running a large model, and noticed that I > > couldn't easily find an answer: > > > > IIUC r.mapcalc does not support scientific notation of floating point > > numbers (i.e. 2.54e-05 instead of 0.254). Is that correct ? > > > >

Re: [GRASS-dev] scientific notation in r.mapcalc ?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Moritz Lennert wrote: > Hi, > > I just stumbled upon this while running a large model, and noticed that I > couldn't easily find an answer: > > IIUC r.mapcalc does not support scientific notation of floating point > numbers (i.e.

[GRASS-dev] scientific notation in r.mapcalc ?

Hi, I just stumbled upon this while running a large model, and noticed that I couldn't easily find an answer: IIUC r.mapcalc does not support scientific notation of floating point numbers (i.e. 2.54e-05 instead of 0.254). Is that correct ? How difficult would it be to implement the