On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.net wrote:
Shouldn't i.pca have, in both G64x and G7, the overwrite flag?
Ideally yes. It will be lacking due to the prefix= approach used therein.
nikosalexandris.net wrote:
Shouldn't i.pca have, in both G64x and G7, the overwrite flag?
..
Markus Metz wrote:
Fixed in r58311.
Cool! Confirmed, it's there :-)
Nikos
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Vaclav,
indirectly relevant with the standard flags discussion which is related to the
prefixes is the following:
I likely have zero idea about why prefix-es and not suffix-es. And I might
just add noise but I mostly prefer adding a suffix. I think this keeps things
cleaner and makes it
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.net wrote:
Shouldn't i.pca have, in both G64x and G7, the overwrite flag?
Ideally yes. It will be lacking due to the prefix= approach used therein.
The same applies to r.texture.
On the contrary: r.lake offers two overwrite
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.net wrote:
Shouldn't i.pca have, in both G64x and G7, the overwrite flag?
Ideally yes. It will be lacking due to the prefix= approach used
Shouldn't i.pca have, in both G64x and G7, the overwrite flag?
Nikos
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On the contrary: r.lake offers two overwrite flags :p
r.lake has:
-o Overwrite seed map with result (lake) map
which is distinct from
--o Allow output files to overwrite existing files
I think that -o just
