Glynn, can you please apply the attached patch for r.watershed in
grass/trunk? It contains last fixes for MFD support including usable (I
hope) basin determination.
Thank you,
Markus M
diff -ruP r.watershed/front/main.c r.watershed.mfd/front/main.c
--- r.watershed/front/main.c2008-12-09
Markus Metz wrote:
Glynn, can you please apply the attached patch for r.watershed in
grass/trunk? It contains last fixes for MFD support including usable (I
hope) basin determination.
Done, r34821.
--
Glynn Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:47:05 +
From: Glynn Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] r.watershed2 with MFD
To: Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Michael wrote:
If this tests OK, it would be good to get it backported into 6.4 too.
at some point we have to stop allowing experimental code into devbr6...
I'd rather we kept the r.watershed that was there now (faster but importantly
identical output), and leave the ongoing development of the
I took the request for MFD support in r.watershed by Helena and Dylan to
heart and implemented it, but still need a few more days to clean up the
code, then I want to submit it as r.watershed2.mfd to grass-addons.
A first result for flow accumulation is here:
Sorry, a mistake in the additional time requirements for MFD on
elev_lid1972_1m:
r.watershed2 with SFD: 0.7 seconds
r.watershed2 with MFD: 1.0 seconds
Markus Metz wrote:
I took the request for MFD support in r.watershed by Helena and Dylan to
heart and implemented it, but still need a few more
On 05/12/08 10:55, Markus Metz wrote:
I took the request for MFD support in r.watershed by Helena and Dylan to
heart and implemented it
Great job !!! Thanks a lot.
but still need a few more days to clean up the
code, then I want to submit it as r.watershed2.mfd to grass-addons.
After the
On Dec 5, 2008, at 2:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:55:17 +0100
From: Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [GRASS-dev] r.watershed2 with MFD
To: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I took the request
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took the request for MFD support in r.watershed by Helena and Dylan to
heart and implemented it, but still need a few more days to clean up the
code, then I want to submit it as r.watershed2.mfd to grass-addons.
A first
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Markus Metz markus_metz at gmx.de wrote:
I took the request for MFD support in r.watershed by Helena and Dylan to
heart and implemented it, but still need a few more days to clean up the
code, then I want to submit it as r.watershed2.mfd to grass-addons.
A
Markus,
at this point, as you suggest, the best would be to work on this in
grass7 - do you have SVN commit access?
Helena
On Dec 5, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Markus Metz wrote:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I took the request
I have SVN commit access for grass-addons, is this also valid for grass7?
BTW my nightmare is to screw up the svn history that's why I hesitate to
submit directly to grass7 (or grass64).
Helena Mitasova wrote:
Markus,
at this point, as you suggest, the best would be to work on this in
On Friday 05 December 2008, Markus Metz wrote:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took the request for MFD support in r.watershed by Helena and Dylan to
heart and implemented it, but still need a few more days to clean up the
Markus Metz wrote:
BTW my nightmare is to screw up the svn history that's why I hesitate to
submit directly to grass7 (or grass64).
The only thing that can really screw up the history is to make a local
copy, then add it to the repository as if it were new code. This not
only loses all prior
14 matches
Mail list logo
