Michael Barton:
I add that there is probably no perfect solution to this question.
There is no intent to be exclusive. But tt is not always easy to ID who
is actively contributing. For example, compiling and disseminating
GRASS binaries is an essential contribution to the project, but anyone
m
This sounds like a good interim step for now. It is something that the new PSC
should continue to work on.
Michael
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Head, Graduate Faculty
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Michael Barton wrote:
> My perspective is that active contributors to the project should vote. How to
> define them is a
> more complicated issue and one of the things that prompted the long email
> chain in the PCS IIRC.
Indeed
Additionally, it is *very* c
I add that there is probably no perfect solution to this question. There is no
intent to be exclusive. But tt is not always easy to ID who is actively
contributing. For example, compiling and disseminating GRASS binaries is an
essential contribution to the project, but anyone maintaining binarie
My perspective is that active contributors to the project should vote. How to
define them is a more complicated issue and one of the things that prompted the
long email chain in the PCS IIRC.
Michael
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Profe
Dear Michael,
thank you for this valuable insight, as it clearly comes out of great
experience.
Would we, however, consider active community members who use, work and
contribute time and expertise to document and demonstrate (in the Wiki
and elsewhere) GRASS-GIS, as project contributors?
In th
I am concerned that there is a misunderstanding of how the project operates and
what the PSC does here. In brief, it oversees the "project"--that is, the
development and distribution of GRASS software. This project involves a
community of developers who contribute time and expertise to create, m
Dear all
on-sight, as Nikos, I share Vero's skepsis, concerns and feelings. I
support that there is still time to re-consider and, given we have a
safe voting system available, community members should be eligible to vote.
As CRO, trying not to confuse my roles (community member vs. CRO), I
t
FYI!
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Veronica Andreo"
Date: Jul 25, 2016 7:26 PM
Subject: [GRASS-dev] Comment regarding PSC election
To: "grass-user" , "grass-dev" <
grass-...@lists.osgeo.org>
Cc:
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to make a comment regarding the ongoing PSC election.
