Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-04-06 Thread Martin Landa
Hi Markus, 2014-04-06 10:01 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com: big strong +1 for me, Martin +1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes releasebranch_7_0. The (my) objective is to stabilize any

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-04-06 Thread Martin Landa
Dear PSC members, 2014-04-06 10:08 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com: +1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes releasebranch_7_0. The (my) objective is to stabilize any releasebranch. this should

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-04-06 Thread Markus Neteler
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, 2014-03-31 9:57 GMT+02:00 Sören Gebbert soerengebb...@googlemail.com: +1 I agree to 100% big strong +1 for me, Martin also from me: retire GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6). markusN

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-04-06 Thread Moritz Lennert
On 06/04/14 13:46, Hamish wrote: First of all, I believe this discussion belongs on the grass-dev list, not PSC. See RFC1. CC'in to dev-list releasebranch70 should not have been branched until 7.0RC1. Until RC1 it is just wasted effort to keep the two of them as a 1:1 mirror, so what's

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-04-06 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be: As already mentioned I was also a bit surprised by this. I'm not sure we are really ready for something more than a tech-preview (and not a real release), but maybe it could be the kick in the behind that we need to

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-04-06 Thread Markus Metz
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote: On 06/04/14 13:46, Hamish wrote: As mentioned before, I wish to use the bulk of my grass dev time maintaining the grass 6 line. To do that properly I need a staging area, and devbr6 is it. I don't see the

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-03-30 Thread Yann Chemin
+1 On 30 March 2014 02:47, Helmut Kudrnovsky hel...@web.de wrote: Dear GRASS GIS PSC, margherita wrote Dear Luca, thank you for raising this issue, On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi lt; lucadeluge@ gt; wrote: with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to

Re: [GRASS-PSC] too many branches = retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

2014-03-29 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky
Dear GRASS GIS PSC, margherita wrote Dear Luca, thank you for raising this issue, On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi lt; lucadeluge@ gt; wrote: with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to many branches to maintain (releasebranch6, devbranch6, releasebranch7 and