Hi Markus, all El mar, 7 jun 2022 a las 11:42, Markus Neteler (<nete...@osgeo.org>) escribió:
> Hi PSC, > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 9:55 PM Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:26 PM Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > All right, that is yes for ORCiD IDs. > > > > > > Next question: Are we putting them to contributors.csv as a new column > or doing something else? > > > > In pull request > > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/2177 > > I have added a new orcid column (https://orcid.org/) to the file. > > > > I have also made a quick round of searches to identify some ORCIDs. > > Please review. > > Still valid :-) > > > > In case we create another file (CITATION.cff or .zenodo.json) with a > list of names from GitHub, it seems we have two different lists of authors. > > > Or is that what we want? A list of all authors/contributors including > the very historical ones and another shorter list of people which is used > > > for citation. How do you qualify for the list? You get to the top N > committers on GitHub? > > > > Perhaps something like > > - list from https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/graphs/contributors > > - order by commits > > - consider the last 12 months. > > What do you think? IMHO the CITATION.cff / .zenodo.json could change > from release to release since the contributors per release are > changing. > I personally like this idea as it seems fair to those contributing more in each release. Vero
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
