On 01/10/08 02:55, Hamish wrote:
Markus:
(Un)related: could be have
g.gui wx
as a shortcut? wxpython is really hard to type...
The opt-options part of the parser only allows through full names.
But it should be possible to parse the answer taking into account
shorter versions. See, for
The opt-options part of the parser only allows
through full names.
Moritz Lennert wrote:
But it should be possible to parse the answer taking into account
shorter versions. See, for example, how type_opt is parsed on lines
478ff in display/d.vect/main.c.
sure there's code in d.vect to
d.vect is not a good example, as it should be using
Vect_option_to_types(). No wonder that GRASS has so many LOC - lots of
duplication ;)
Maris.
2008/10/1, Moritz Lennert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/10/08 02:55, Hamish wrote:
Markus:
(Un)related: could be have
g.gui wx
as a shortcut? wxpython
Hello,
currently there is no MASK support for vector data. Only solution is
to extract a subset of whole dataset into new vector map/layer with
existing GRASS tools (i.e. v.extract and others).
Also MASK concept for vector data is easy to implement for vector
points but it gets tricky with
Alberto Pettazzi wrote:
I have a pressure field and I want to plot contour lines. I did it by
the command r.contour, but I would like to have smoother contour lines
(see attached file). Any suggestion?
Is your region resolution far higher than than the actual raster
resolution? If that's
Hamish wrote:
The opt-options part of the parser only allows
through full names.
Moritz Lennert wrote:
But it should be possible to parse the answer taking into account
shorter versions. See, for example, how type_opt is parsed on lines
478ff in display/d.vect/main.c.
sure
Another thing (which I'd like to see in GRASS 7.0) would be to have a
where parameter for all v. modules which would allow one to filter the
points based on the attributes (usually this is enough)
--Wolf
On 01.10.2008 21:03, Maris Nartiss wrote:
Hello,
currently there is no MASK support for
You are welcome, Zahid.
No need for formal addressing on the GRASS mailing
lists. Feel free to call people by their first names.
Best,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Zahid Parvez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Benjamin Ducke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 8:29:53 PM (GMT)
Yes, that would be useful too.
Yes, in the case of vector points, a MASK-like function would be
conceptually simpler than dealing with vector lines and polygons.
v.voronoi produces lots of spurious polygons if there is lots of space
without points outside where the points actually lie, which
