Hello everyone,
I georefered several RADAR GIF from a desired storm in my research and
realized there are some numbers set as an attribute in the pixels, beside
the pixel RGB color.
I found GIF generally is an option to export original CAPPI and PPI RADAR
images.
Such original RADAR images conta
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Anna Petrášová
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Michael Barton
> wrote:
>
>> I’ve been using QGIS to do basic data display for research data. It has
>> trashed the attribute tables on the last day.
>>
>> I’m trying to recover the data with GRASS—wh
I’ve been using QGIS to do basic data display for research data. It has trashed
the attribute tables on the last day.
I’m trying to recover the data with GRASS—where I want to analyze it anyway.
But when I try to import a non-trashed file, I exported to a shape file from
QGIS, I get an error of
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Michael Barton
wrote:
> I’ve been using QGIS to do basic data display for research data. It has
> trashed the attribute tables on the last day.
>
> I’m trying to recover the data with GRASS—where I want to analyze it
> anyway. But when I try to import a non-tras
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Martin Landa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-06-10 22:07 GMT+02:00 Anna Petrášová :
> > what's the status of the binaries, the server seems to run, but last
> > binaries are from Jun 5th... There seems to be some compilation problem
> with
> > g.parser?
>
> now it should be
Hi,
2015-06-10 22:07 GMT+02:00 Anna Petrášová :
> what's the status of the binaries, the server seems to run, but last
> binaries are from Jun 5th... There seems to be some compilation problem with
> g.parser?
now it should be back (building on the new server). Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:21 AM, vishal tiwari
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to run the r.sim.water in GRASS. I have calculated the
> partial derivatives dx and dy rater map using r.slope.aspect. I am using
> this elevation map [1] to get the time-series depth map. But I think the
> output fi