On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 13:10 -0700, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Paulo Marcondes wrote:
Hi,
What would be the recommended way to downsample a raster?
my region resolution is currently 100m, say I want to resample my
rasters at 300m.
Why would I want to do that?
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:06 +0200, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
[...]
What about cubic upscaling and then back to your original resolution?
Back with nearest neighbour I wanted to say.
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
Hi,
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:06:03 Nikos Alexandris wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 13:10 -0700, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
r.resamp.stats (=GRASS 6.3)
What about cubic upscaling and then back to your original resolution?
I would say that r.resamp.stats is a better way. What you are trying to do
Paulo Marcondes wrote:
What would be the recommended way to downsample a raster?
my region resolution is currently 100m, say I want to resample my
rasters at 300m.
Why would I want to do that? Well, currently the data is too rough,
but filtering may introduce some artifacts.
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Paulo Marcondes wrote:
Hi,
What would be the recommended way to downsample a raster?
my region resolution is currently 100m, say I want to resample my
rasters at 300m.
Why would I want to do that? Well, currently the data is too rough,
but filtering may
