Luigi Ponti wrote:
If the latter,
you don't see grass using much memory because it is fairly efficent
most of the time and doesn't need to- especially the core GIS and
raster parts of it. When you consider the amount of RAM+CPU power
typically available back when that code was written,
Hamish wrote:
Luigi Ponti wrote:
As a less-than-two-year old cygwin/GRASS user, I have never seen
virtual memory going over 1 GB while doing intensive computations
with GRASS (e.g., v.surf.idw interpolation).
Have you been getting out-of-memory errors or are you concerned that
you are
Luigi Ponti wrote:
As a less-than-two-year old cygwin/GRASS user, I have never seen virtual
memory going over 1 GB while doing intensive computations with GRASS
(e.g., v.surf.idw interpolation). I haven't found much on the topic in
the web so I tried the following to increase virtual
