On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Jarek Jasiewicz wrote:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2008, Jarosław Jasiewicz wrote:
Nikos Alexandris pisze:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 22:52 -0300, Carlos Guâno Grohmann wrote:
Hello all
[...]
is plan curvature in r.param.scale broken? I can't
On Monday 03 March 2008, Jarosław Jasiewicz wrote:
Nikos Alexandris pisze:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 22:52 -0300, Carlos Guâno Grohmann wrote:
Hello all
[...]
is plan curvature in r.param.scale broken? I can't get a map of it.
profc works fine. Also is it possible to make r.param.scale
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2008, Jarosław Jasiewicz wrote:
Nikos Alexandris pisze:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 22:52 -0300, Carlos Guâno Grohmann wrote:
Hello all
[...]
is plan curvature in r.param.scale broken? I can't get a map of it.
profc works
Carlos Guâno Grohmann schrieb:
Hello all
first I'd like to make a few suggestions to enhance (IMO) our favorite GIS:
- normalize the options in all modules. I noticed that while most
commands take --overwrite, some (r.neighbors) use -o
I guess the problem is, that there are to many modules
Craig Leat schrieb:
Philipp Steigenberger wrote:
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:38:24 +0100
From: Philipp Steigenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] a few suggestions and questions
To: Carlos \Gu?no\ Grohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
Carlos Guâno
Hi,
2008/3/4, Carlos Guâno Grohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
first I'd like to make a few suggestions to enhance (IMO) our favorite GIS:
- normalize the options in all modules. I noticed that while most
commands take --overwrite, some (r.neighbors) use -o
todo for grass7 development,
Hello all
first I'd like to make a few suggestions to enhance (IMO) our favorite GIS:
- normalize the options in all modules. I noticed that while most
commands take --overwrite, some (r.neighbors) use -o
- some modules require a dummy value when output a list (r.mask,
r.proj, v.proj..). Is this
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 22:52 -0300, Carlos Guâno Grohmann wrote:
Hello all
[...]
is plan curvature in r.param.scale broken? I can't get a map of it.
profc works fine. Also is it possible to make r.param.scale work in
latlong regions? (please?)
Probably not! Just tested... and it says:
Nikos Alexandris pisze:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 22:52 -0300, Carlos Guâno Grohmann wrote:
Hello all
[...]
is plan curvature in r.param.scale broken? I can't get a map of it.
profc works fine. Also is it possible to make r.param.scale work in
latlong regions? (please?)
it is
