Thank you so much, Markus!
That was the missing hint and it works now!
However, I just went through the documentation, which says: /F/ means
that the functions always results in a floating point value and
Function log has F.
This is somehow misleading and rather should be an *. Can I correct
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Patrick S. patrick_...@gmx.ch wrote:
Thank you so much, Markus!
That was the missing hint and it works now!
However, I just went through the documentation, which says: F means that
the functions always results in a floating point value and Function log
has F.
Markus,
I understand your arguments, but A is the slope of r.slope.aspect and
has floating point values as input for the formula. I just created a
testcase to be able to report on the behavior in detail. As you can see
below the results are truncated to integer as soon as I add a term to
A
Patrick S. wrote:
###Testcase2: formula= log(((A+1)/100)/(1-(A+1/100)))
Note that
(A+1/100) = A+(1/100) = A
as 1/100 will use integer division.
--
Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com
___
grass-user mailing list
Dear List,
I keep getting a log(0) error in r.mapcalculator, even if I enlarge the
data. This seems to be a bug as I controlled the same data with R and
get (non-infinity) values. Does r.mapcalculator eventually truncate the
results of formulas to some integer values?
logit-expression:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Patrick S. patrick_...@gmx.ch wrote:
Dear List,
I keep getting a log(0) error in r.mapcalculator, even if I enlarge the
data. This seems to be a bug as I controlled the same data with R and get
(non-infinity) values. Does r.mapcalculator eventually truncate
