Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question [RESOLVED]

2012-03-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Carlos Grohmann wrote: To me, in Brazil, I use illumination from NW (315) or NE (045). Carlos, Well, it must be Friday because while I meant to assign the azimuth to 225 degrees (southwest), I kept typing 325. No wonder it did not appear correct! With the sun at the

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Carlos Grohmann wrote: It's just an optical illusion. If you live on the northern hemisphere you are more 'used' to see images with illumination from the south Carlos, Yes, I know that aerial photos should be oriented so the shadows are toward the bottom of the print. P

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Carlos Grohmann
Inverted relief on shaded maps (and also on aerial photos or satellite images) is called pseudoscopy. It's just an optical illusion. If you live on the northern hemisphere you are more 'used' to see images with illumination from the south (and vice-versa for southern hemisphere), so when you hav

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Micha Silver wrote: Ooops, Correction: when azimuth=315 the sun is from the *South* West, producing naturally looking relief maps. Micha, You were right the first time. From the manual page, "The azimuth of the sun in degrees to the east of north (a value between 0 and

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Micha Silver
On 03/23/2012 09:29 PM, Micha Silver wrote: On 03/23/2012 08:31 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Daniel Lee wrote: ... 235° would be ... from the southwest.   Yep. That's the way it

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Micha Silver
On 03/23/2012 08:31 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Daniel Lee wrote: ... 235° would be ... from the southwest.   Yep. That's the way it usually works. It's just an optical illusion. Rota

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Daniel Lee wrote: I can't imagine that resampling would reverse the DEM values though. Me, neither. A glance at r.info would give you the answer to that - if the values are mostly negative, it should be a pretty good sign that you're either in Death Valley or inverted

Re: [GRASS-user] r.shaded.relief Output Question

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel Lee
Hi Rich, I can't imagine that resampling would reverse the DEM values though. A glance at r.info would give you the answer to that - if the values are mostly negative, it should be a pretty good sign that you're either in Death Valley or inverted :P One thing to note with r.shaded.relief though i