RE: [GRASS-user] MASK seems to be ignored

2008-02-07 Thread Glynn Clements
Patton, Eric wrote: Checking the range of the raster I used for a mask in my r.mask command, it was 0-32767; so shouldn't r.mask in=MAP also create a mask where any non-null cell in the input raster exists? Here's the output from r.info for the mask I created using r.mask: MASK

RE: [GRASS-user] MASK seems to be ignored

2008-02-06 Thread Patton, Eric
Checking the range of the raster I used for a mask in my r.mask command, it was 0-32767; so shouldn't r.mask in=MAP also create a mask where any non-null cell in the input raster exists? Here's the output from r.info for the mask I created using r.mask: MASK maps usually look like this.