Re: [GRASS-user] Multi-criteria evaluation

On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Markus Neteler wrote: there is a set of addons: https://grass.osgeo.org/grass7/manuals/addons/ Markus, I didn't think of looking at the addons. - r.mcda.ahp : Generates a raster map classified with

Re: [GRASS-user] Multi-criteria evaluation

Rich, On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:10 PM Rich Shepard wrote: > A search for multi-criteria evaluation on the grass landing web page > returns > no results. Are there any documents or projects using grass for MCE > available for sharing? > there is a set of addons:

[GRASS-user] Multi-criteria evaluation

A search for multi-criteria evaluation on the grass landing web page returns no results. Are there any documents or projects using grass for MCE available for sharing? TIA, Rich ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [GRASS-user] ESRI formats: gdb and shp

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Daniel Victoria wrote: This is an old PDF (2009) but it lists some advantages of file geodatabase. https://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0309/files/9reasons.pdf Daniel, Thanks for the URI. Another thing worth mentioning is that in order to do topological analysis in ESRIs

Re: [GRASS-user] ESRI formats: gdb and shp

Rich, This is an old PDF (2009) but it lists some advantages of file geodatabase. https://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0309/files/9reasons.pdf Another thing worth mentioning is that in order to do topological analysis in ESRIs world, you would need to use geodatabases since shapefiles does not

Re: [GRASS-user] ESRI formats: gdb and shp

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Daniel Victoria wrote: What do you mean by better? Correct data? Easier to import? Daniel, More complete topographic information. I recall learning a long time ago that shapefiles are not as topographically complete as other formats such as the older (and excellent) .e00

Re: [GRASS-user] ESRI formats: gdb and shp

What do you mean by better? Correct data? Easier to import? If they contain the same data I think it does not matter which one you use. Specially because you are talking about point data. But, if there is a difference in the data, then you have another problem. Figuring out which one is correct

[GRASS-user] ESRI formats: gdb and shp

I have two files of point locations: sites.gdb and sites.shp. I also have a file with (I assume) the same data. Am I correct is assuming that the .gdb file would be topographically preferred over the .shp file and the better one to import? Rich ___