Just reporting...
v.labels.sa works fine on a metric projection. Yet, I don't understand
how the isize= parameter affects the location of the labels.
Sometimes labels are placed over the x points (point icons which
represent for example my climatic stations).
Greetings,
Nikos
On 19.06.2008 15:24, Hamish wrote:
once we resolve issues it is my goal that v.label.sa becomes a flag
of v.label instead of another module. that way the features won't get
out of sync as they are now. (e.g. fixed fontsize=)
The problem is that v.label.sa needs to always use map sizes or then
As far as I understand, there is no mechanism for optimal label
placement when labels overlay partially to each other.
I think it is an important feature. Are there any work-arounds within
grass (except of exporting to lets say SVG and play around with a vector
graphics program)? Or any plans to
On 19.06.2008 00:40, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
As far as I understand, there is no mechanism for optimal label
placement when labels overlay partially to each other.
There is an experimental module v.label.sa, available in the svn. It is
ready but I'm still waiting on word for patches to ps.map
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 01:40 +0300, Wolf Bergenheim wrote:
On 19.06.2008 00:40, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
As far as I understand, there is no mechanism for optimal label
placement when labels overlay partially to each other.
There is an experimental module v.label.sa, available in the svn. It
On 19.06.2008 01:44, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
I am fighting to get something on the screen. I have the impression that
it works but I can't find the proper size (in metres)?
Would this be considered as an extra feature? Estimating a default size?
Excuse my ignorance if this is something
Nikos:
I am fighting to get something on the screen. I have the
impression that it works but I can't find the proper size
(in metres)?
I am not sure if v.label.la supports this, but with v.labels you can do
fontsize= and then a standard size is used for all, not based on map units.
the idea
