JerryNelson wrote:
>
> When you get this all working, please post a description of the final
> outcome in the grass wiki.
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
Hi
I have added a new entry to the FAQ to the best of my understanding of the
problem and its solutions. Please visit
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wi
When you get this all working, please post a description of the final outcome
in the grass wiki.
Thanks,
Jerry
Original message
>Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:16:10 +0200
>From: Craig Leat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] Working with a large number of ma
Glynn Clements wrote:
Craig Leat wrote:
I have 139 high resolution images, which I need to use as a background map
for some digitizing work.
How do the individual maps relate to the overall region?
If they are (approximately) tiles, I would suggest using a
hierarchical approach, patch
Craig Leat wrote:
> I have 139 high resolution images, which I need to use as a background map
> for some digitizing work. Loading 139x3 layers into gis.m is a real pain and
> I can think of three workarounds.
> 3. Use r.patch to build one mosaic for each band.
> I currently have r.patch runnin
Craig wrote:
I can think of three workarounds.
1. Enter Rainer Krug and MapServer.
I don't think my time frames allow for learning another software suite
right now.
2. Use a script to build a .grc file with a group for gis.m.
Before attempting this I would like to know if
Hi,
2007/12/18, Craig Leat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> I don't know what to expect, but was hoping for something like:
> r.patch progress:
> Currently processing map: abc.red, progress: 80%
> Total progress: 15%
Since r.patch works by row (reads x-row of the first, second, ...
given raster ma
Martin Landa wrote:
> > What kind of verbose output are you expecting?
Craig:
> I don't know what to expect, but was hoping for something like:
> r.patch progress:
> Currently processing map: abc.red, progress: 80%
> Total progress: 15%
>
> This may be something to be added to the wishlist?
--v
Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2007/12/18, Craig Leat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
What kind of verbose output are you expecting?
Martin
Hi
I don't know what to expect, but was hoping for something like:
r.patch progress:
Currently processing map: abc.red, progress: 80%
Total progress: 15%
Thi
Hi,
2007/12/18, Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Note that GRASS_VERBOSE=0 is the same as --q, GRASS_VERBOSE=1 -> --v.
Ops, GRASS_VERBOSE=3 -> --v
See
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/Development_Specs#Current_abstract_concept
Martin
--
Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://gama.fsv
Hi,
2007/12/18, Craig Leat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> Another question on the usage of r.patch:
> I have passed the option --verbose to r.patch and I am expecting the program
> to generate VERBOSE output, but all I'm seeing is the following:
>
> GRASS 6.3.0RC3 (msunduzi_lo31):~ > r.patch inpu
Hi
I have 139 high resolution images, which I need to use as a background map
for some digitizing work. Loading 139x3 layers into gis.m is a real pain and
I can think of three workarounds.
1. Enter Rainer Krug and MapServer.
I don't think my time frames allow for learning another software suite
11 matches
Mail list logo